Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Back to Grand Rounds
Grand RoundsWeekly Evidence Brief

Transplant Surgery

Edition

30-Second Takeaway

  • High intrapatient trough variability predicts higher acute rejection and graft loss in renal transplant recipients.
  • Risk-adapted CMV PCR surveillance identifies a subgroup of auto-HCT recipients at meaningful risk for severe CMV complications.

Week ending June 20, 2026

MedBrevia Grand Rounds — transplant surgery highlights

High intrapatient variability in immunosuppressant troughs associates with rejection and graft loss

TRANSPLANTATIONJun 19, 2026

Meta-analysis of 41 renal transplant studies found high intrapatient variability (IPV) linked to more acute rejection and worse allograft survival. Patients with low IPV had 44% lower risk of acute rejection versus high-IPV patients (RR = 0.56). High IPV was associated with increased graft loss (HR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.70–3.46). Authors conclude IPV is a potentially modifiable risk factor warranting routine monitoring in renal transplant care.

Donor wage reimbursement (up to $3,000) did not increase living-donor kidney transplants at 1 year

TRANSPLANTATIONJun 17, 2026

Randomized trial compared maximum reimbursements of $1500 or $3000 versus matched historical controls for patients undergoing transplant evaluation. At one year, access to any reimbursement was not associated with higher LDKT (aOR 0.85; 95% CI 0.39–1.85; P = 0.68). Reimbursement level ($1500 vs $3000) did not change donor evaluation initiation or LDKT rates. Exploratory longer follow-up suggested possible benefit, but primary one-year results do not support wage reimbursement alone as an effective short-term expansion strategy.

Three pretransplant phenogroups predict divergent five-year mortality after heart transplant

TRANSPLANTATIONJun 17, 2026

Latent class analysis of 3,683 adult first heart transplant recipients identified three recipient phenogroups with distinct risks. Five-year mortality was 24.0%, 28.5%, and 33.0% across groups, with higher HRs in phenogroups 2 and 3 versus group 1. Causes of death differed by group: graft failure predominated in group 1, infection in groups 2 and 3. Phenotype classification showed high internal stability but only modest discrimination (optimism-adjusted C = 0.55), suggesting usefulness for tailoring surveillance rather than definitive prognostication.

References

Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.

Additional Reads

Optional additional studies from this edition.

Edition context

Clinical signal

  • Monitor tacrolimus/other trough IPV and act on consistent high variability signals.
  • Do not expect modest donor wage reimbursements alone to expand living donation within one year.
  • Consider phenotype-informed intensity of post–heart transplant surveillance.