Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Back to Grand Rounds
Grand RoundsWeekly Evidence Brief

Pulmonology

Edition

30-Second Takeaway

  • Joint modeling of FVC decline and mortality reduces bias when estimating treatment effects in fibrotic ILD.
  • A 2-year exacerbation window better discriminates future COPD exacerbation risk than the standard past-year criteria.
  • Varenicline sampling increased self-reported 6‑month abstinence versus no sampling and versus NRT.

Week ending May 9, 2026

Selected recent respiratory evidence: modeling, risk prediction, quality improvement, and cessation

Joint Bayesian model shows larger FVC decline and less bias in fibrotic ILD analyses

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINEMay 5, 2026

A Bayesian joint mixed effects disease progression model jointly estimated FVC trajectory and mortality risk in fibrotic ILD cohorts. Compared with a linear mixed model of FVC alone, the joint model yielded a higher estimated FVC decline (6.0%/year vs 4.7%/year). The approach better fit non-linear trajectories and increases information per patient, reducing bias from differential mortality when estimating treatment effects. This model is intended for trial analysis or population characterization rather than bedside prognostication.

Multidisciplinary pathway greatly increased delivery of guideline-concordant inpatient pediatric asthma care

PEDIATRICSMay 8, 2026

A hospital medicine quality improvement intervention raised all‑three-component optimal asthma care from 15% to 69% over 12 months. Interventions combined clinical decision support, education, and enhanced interdisciplinary communication aligned with GINA updates. The bundle was associated with reduced length of stay and fewer 90‑day readmissions. Process measures included all-or-none completion of risk assessment, maintenance plan, and a discharge action plan.

Two‑year exacerbation history improves prediction of future COPD exacerbations

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINEMay 5, 2026

In COPDGene and NOVELTY cohorts, any moderate or severe exacerbation in the prior two years gave the highest discrimination for next‑year risk. Observed AUCs were 0.69 (COPDGene) and 0.87 (NOVELTY), with improvement over the past‑year standard (ΔAUC 0.03 and 0.12). Net‑benefit analysis favored rolling two‑year windows across clinically relevant treatment thresholds (5%–30%). At least one moderate or severe exacerbation over two years is a pragmatic rule to flag higher exacerbation risk.

References

Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.

Additional Reads

Optional additional studies from this edition.

Edition context

Clinical signal

  • Consider statistical joint models in trial analysis or interpretation; they may change estimated treatment effect sizes.
  • Use exacerbation history over two years when assessing COPD exacerbation risk, not solely the prior 12 months.
  • Deploy multidisciplinary pathways and decision support to improve inpatient pediatric asthma care delivery.