Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Back to Grand Rounds
Grand RoundsWeekly Evidence Brief

Hematology

Edition
Latest

30-Second Takeaway

  • A holistic pre-transplant H-score meaningfully stratifies leukemia-free survival after allo-HCT.
  • Software-assisted response at 6 months predicts outcomes in newly diagnosed cGVHD.

Latest - Week ending July 4, 2026

Short evidence brief for hematologists: prognostic models, response assessment, and patient-centered trial insights

Holistic H-score refines leukemia-free survival risk after allo-HCT

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONJul 3, 2026

In 24,317 allografted acute leukemia patients, a pre-transplant H-score stratified 2-year leukemia-free survival from 66.2% (low risk) to 32.0% (very high risk). The H-score was the strongest independent predictor of LFS, and it also predicted overall survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality (p < 0.0001). Component weights came from Cox models in a large training cohort and were validated in a geographically split testing cohort. The authors note individual prediction limits, but recommend the H-score for pre-transplant counseling and benchmarking of transplant strategies.

Family experiences after receiving precision-medicine treatment recommendations in PRISM

NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINEJul 4, 2026

In the PRISM trial, most parents expected a treatment recommendation and 70% received one, though only about half recalled it. Parents reported high involvement (median 93/100) and satisfaction (median 95/100) with decisions after recommendations. Receiving a recommendation did not increase regret about trial participation (p > 0.05). Families viewed recommendations as offering hope and options even when recommendations were absent.

Software-assisted response predicts failure-free survival in newly diagnosed cGVHD

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONJul 3, 2026

In 258 newly diagnosed cGVHD patients, software-assisted (SA) response at 6 months predicted overall survival and failure-free survival better than clinician-based evaluation. ORR by SA was 62% versus 65% by clinician review, with 66% overall agreement between methods. SA better captured mixed responses and identified patients more likely to stop systemic therapy by 12 months. Authors conclude SA evaluation is reliable and prognostically informative for 6-month cGVHD assessment.

References

Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.

Additional Reads

Optional additional studies from this edition.

Edition context

Clinical signal

  • Use the H-score to refine pre-transplant counseling and risk-adapted trial enrollment.
  • When available, incorporate software-assisted cGVHD response assessment into 6-month review.
  • Treat precision-medicine recommendations to families as hopeful but often not recalled verbatim.