Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Back to Grand Rounds
Grand RoundsWeekly Evidence Brief

General Surgery

Edition
Latest

30-Second Takeaway

  • New persistent opioid use (NPOU) after surgery affects about **7%** of opioid‑naïve US patients.
  • A 5x‑multiplier discharge algorithm substantially reduces prescribed discharge opioids without worse short‑term consumption or satisfaction.

Latest - Week ending June 27, 2026

Selected recent surgical and perioperative evidence summaries

NPOU occurs in roughly 7% of opioid‑naïve US surgical patients.

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINEJun 27, 2026

This meta‑analysis pooled 43 observational studies (n=6,507,173) and estimated a pooled NPOU incidence of 7.15% (95% CI 6.02–8.38). Heterogeneity was very high (I2=100%) with a 95% prediction interval of 1.34%–17.02%, reflecting inconsistent definitions and follow‑up windows. Estimates varied by definition: studies using a 90–180 day window reported higher incidence than those requiring opioid use across 180 days. No consistent differences were found by surgery type, payer, age, sex, or race in metaregression analyses.

5x‑multiplier discharge algorithm cut median discharge OME from 75 mg to 25 mg.

ANNALS OF SURGERYJun 20, 2026

In a pragmatic RCT of 150 adults after open intra‑abdominal cancer surgery, median discharge OME was 25 mg with the 5x‑multiplier versus 75 mg with a 3‑tier model (P<0.001). Fourteen‑day median opioid consumption was similar (0 mg vs 10 mg, P=0.496), and patient satisfaction and symptom scores did not differ. Forty‑four percent of patients in the 5x arm were discharged opioid‑free versus 1% in the 3‑tier arm. Refill rates were numerically similar (24% vs 18%, P=0.426), suggesting reduced initial prescribing did not clearly increase short‑term refill needs.

Machine learning models outperform traditional cardiac risk scores but lack external validation.

ANAESTHESIAJun 22, 2026

This Bayesian network meta‑analysis included 13 studies, 54 models, and 927,113 patients, finding ML approaches generally outperformed the Revised Cardiac Risk Index. Automated ML (SUCRA 96.6) and gradient boosting showed the largest discrimination gains versus traditional scores. Few studies performed external validation and calibration reporting was inconsistent, limiting immediate clinical adoption. Authors recommend prospective multicentre evaluation before routine perioperative implementation.

References

Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.

Additional Reads

Optional additional studies from this edition.

Edition context

Clinical signal

  • For discharge opioid plans, consider a 5x‑multiplier to reduce prescriptions and allow refills if needed.
  • Interpret ML perioperative risk tools cautiously until externally validated and prospectively tested.
  • When applying NPOU estimates, note wide heterogeneity across definitions and follow‑up windows.