30-Second Takeaway
- Impella-based LV unloading with planned PCI delay does not reduce infarct size and increases complications in anterior STEMI without shock.
- Left bundle branch pacing cuts pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and better preserves LV function versus RV pacing in high-burden pacing patients.
- Edoxaban monotherapy reduces total event burden versus dual therapy in AF with stable CAD, mainly by lowering bleeding without more ischemia.
Week ending April 25, 2026
Acute Coronary, Rhythm, and Heart Failure Care: New Data to Refine Everyday Decisions
Impella-Based LV Unloading With PCI Delay Fails to Improve Outcomes in Anterior STEMI Without Shock
In 527 anterior STEMI patients without shock, LV unloading using a microaxial pump plus 30-minute PCI delay did not reduce infarct size versus immediate PCI. Cardiac MRI showed similar infarct size indexed to LV mass between unloading and control groups (30.8% vs 31.9%; mean difference -1.1%; P = 0.50). Total ischemic time was longer and major bleeding or vascular complications at 30 days were more frequent with unloading. These findings do not support routine pre-PCI Impella-type unloading with deliberate reperfusion delay in hemodynamically stable anterior STEMI.
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Outperforms Right Ventricular Pacing in High-Burden Pacing Patients
In 160 high pacing burden patients at risk for cardiac dysfunction, left bundle branch pacing reduced the composite of death, HF hospitalization, or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy versus RV pacing. Over 36 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 11.6% with left bundle branch pacing vs 33.9% with RV pacing (HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15-0.66). Benefit was driven mainly by less pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (6.5% vs 18.2%; sub-HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.12-0.88). Left bundle branch pacing produced greater LVEF improvement, smaller LV dimensions, and better NYHA class, without clear mortality or HF hospitalization differences alone.
Edoxaban Monotherapy Lowers Total Event Burden Versus Dual Therapy in AF With Stable CAD
This EPIC-CAD post-hoc analysis included 1,040 patients with AF and stable CAD randomized to edoxaban alone or edoxaban plus a single antiplatelet. At 12 months, edoxaban monotherapy halved total net adverse clinical events versus dual therapy (9.4 vs 19.8 per 100 person-years; IRR 0.47; 95% CI 0.34-0.67). Monotherapy reduced both first and recurrent events while maintaining similar ischemic event and mortality rates. Bleeding dominated events in both groups but was more frequent with dual therapy (85.7% vs 55.3% of events).
Single-Sample Rule-Out of MI With a Sixth-Generation hs-cTnT Threshold of 13 ng/L
In 987 ED patients with possible NSTEMI, a sixth-generation hs-cTnT <13 ng/L at presentation classified 61% as low risk. At this threshold, NPV for 30-day MI or cardiac death was 99.9% and sensitivity 99.4% in the derivation cohort. The early rule-out pathway using the sixth-generation assay identified more low-risk patients at presentation than the fifth-generation assay (41.0% vs 17.4%). In an external cohort of 1,721 patients, <13 ng/L identified 45.4% as low risk with NPV 99.0% and sensitivity 97.5%.
References
Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.
Additional Reads
Optional additional studies from this edition.