30-Second Takeaway
- No reliable early predictor identifies which acute urticaria patients will progress to chronic urticaria.
- Respiratory biologics introduction coincided with immediate and sustained population-level reductions in asthma exacerbations.
- Selective JAK1 inhibition produced rapid clinical benefit in palmoplantar pustulosis in a single-arm trial.
Week ending June 27, 2026
Selected 2026 evidence briefs for allergy/immunology clinicians
No consistent predictors of progression from acute to chronic urticaria
This systematic review of 16 studies (52 564 patients) found AU-to-CU progression rates ranging from 5.8% to 36.0% depending on follow-up and setting. Clinical features (severity, angioedema, atopy), laboratory markers, and systemic corticosteroid use lacked consistent association with progression. Heterogeneity, short follow-up, and moderate-to-high risk of bias limited certainty of prognostic signals. Clinical implication: perform careful serial assessment and structured follow-up; avoid assuming a single early marker will stratify chronicity risk.
Population-level asthma exacerbations fell after respiratory biologics entered practice
In 5269 adults seen in specialty clinics (2006–2025), exacerbations rose before 2015 then showed an immediate drop of -474.1 events per 1000 patients per year after 2015. A sustained yearly decline followed (-206.5 events per 1000 patients per year), with larger gains in patients with ≥2 exacerbations and high eosinophils. Results support population-level effectiveness of biologics, particularly in high-risk phenotypes characterized by frequent exacerbations or eosinophilia. Observational interrupted-time-series design cannot prove causality and may reflect secular trends or selection into specialty care.
DOOR endpoint offers patient-centered benefit-risk comparison for ABSSSI trials
Investigators developed an infectious-disease DOOR for ABSSSI and retrospectively applied it to OASIS-1 and OASIS-2 comparing omadacycline versus linezolid. DOOR probabilities were near equipoise: 50.6% (95% CI, 47.4%–53.7%) and 52.1% (95% CI, 49.2%–55.0%) favoring omadacycline in the two trials. Using SF-36v2 as a tiebreaker did not materially change results, and partial-credit analyses were concordant. DOOR may aid benefit-risk interpretation in ABSSSI trials but requires prospective use and validation before regulatory reliance.
References
Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.
Additional Reads
Optional additional studies from this edition.